Bernie Sanders Conspiracy Against Super PAC Man Hits Supreme Court

Bernie Sanders Conspiracy Against Super PAC Man Hits Supreme Court


Brussels, Belgium — March 26, 2019 – The U.S. Court of Appeals in Philadelphia docket entered a copied filing for a ‘mandamus’ action, filed with the U.S. Supreme Court by lobbyist Cary Lee Peterson, subsequent to him being tangled in an inextricable political scandal involving 2020 U.S. Presidential Election candidate, Senator Bernie Sanders and his attorney “Garvey”, and several “virtual representatives” (alleged employed by United States Justice Department) who are defendants of Federal lawsuits for tort and conspiracy filed in New Jersey and Oregon by the Super PAC Man- Peterson, now a political prisoner at the same prison camp as the notorious Black Mafia Family leader Demetrius “Big Meech” Flenory.

Peterson, a civil rights activist who worked as a lobbying registrant at U.S. Congress addressed his ‘Notice of Mandamus’ action to Associate Chief Justice Brett Kavanaugh of the United States Supreme Court on March 13, 2019. In the filing, Peterson recapitulated relative legal issues in a “consolidated’ notice, including a compelling argument on several acts of conspiracy and tort allegedly commissioned by Sen. Bernie Sanders and his campaign team attorney, Brad Deutsch of Garvey Shubert Barer (a law firm in Washington, D.C.), who assembled a mob of “associates” to take down Peterson following an office rumor (started by a Garvey client in Ohio) of allegations on Peterson’s “nonevent” involving a penny stock company, followed by hearsay from an internet political rag a few years later- reckless antics boiled by egos and prejudice, that turned a mere misunderstanding between business friends, lawyers, and politicians into a nonfiction version of 90’s motion-picture ‘Enemy of the State’.


The court filing from Peterson notes multiple legal actions working through the American federal court system in the Third Circuit (including his pending appeal) that have exhausted a significant amount of the U.S. courts’ time and resources—all funded on the labor of U.S. taxpayers, who had unknowingly participated in a political witch-hunt that appears to be ‘stale mate’ situation between Peterson and Sanders, according to claims in the Garvey civil complaint.

Hence, evidence from the initial Garvey lawsuit made it quite evident that Sanders’ attorney Brad Deutsch (owner of Garvey law firm) was indeed the person who ordered the ambush on lobbyist Cary Lee Peterson- causing the snowball effect that landed him in prison last December- inferred by a leaked email from Garvey client “T.K.”, who said two times that “Garvey S[c]hubert” and one his associates “filed the Federal charges” against Peterson. In addition, Peterson states in the Garvey suit that Sanders abused his political official status to pay his attorney Deutsch with political donor funds to commission duress, tort, and conspiracy against him and his political clients- aided and abetted by government and judicial officials to order a criminal prosecution, which made the Garvey lawsuit against Sanders’ virtual representatives (Cary Lee Peterson v. Garvey Shubert Barer, et al.) the unofficial counter-suit to United States v. Cary Lee Peterson.


Ironically, the Bernie Sanders conspiracy allegations in the Garvey lawsuits and ‘Super PAC Man’ appeal case came to light as a collective filing with the U.S. District Court (of the Ninth Circuit), Court of Appeals, and Supreme Court no sooner than Mueller Report on The Hill received adjudication from the U.S. Attorney General Barr that appears to bring temporary relief favorable to U.S. President Donald J. Trump and the Trump Administration.

Unlike America’s President Trump, the 2020 presidential incumbent that promoted ‘making American great again’ in his first presidential election campaign, the Bernie Sanders conspiracy claims in the Garvey lawsuits infer that Sanders is capable of extreme totalitarianistic acts that resemble those of [the late] Cuban President Fidel Castro, who several Cuban-Americans concur was an extreme communist that illegally imprisoned and tortured civilians who revolted against his politics; or anyone in civil society that Castro particularly did not like for whatever reason.

Previously, Sanders has been scrutinized for using campaign funds for holiday homes and private jet expenditures. Nonetheless, the claims against him of allegedly disserving the community, are far-worse than anything President Trump has been accused of committing before or after he became U.S. President in 2017.


The Garvey case disclosure would seem a tidbit flimsy if the evidence submitted had not been laid-out such concise illustrations of the claims against “Garvey” and “John Doe” (acting of behalf of Sanders). Consequently, Garvey case infers key facts that the 2020 Democratic Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders had commissioned tort and conspiracy against Peterson, and was able to do so with the use of funds from his political campaign fund to finance a personal (non-political) attack against Peterson, who rubbed him the wrong way in one way or another.

1. Evidence filed with the Federal courts infer that a non-governmental attorney (“Garvey”) used an “associate” to file “Federal charges” against Peterson- only a Federal judge or attorney are legally capable of filing charges of any kind against a private civilian pursuant to Federal Criminal Rules on Procedures [“Rule 3”].

2. Evidence filed with the Federal courts infer that Garvey (and “Fed” associates; the FBI and the SEC) knew that Peterson was never the “CEO” of the said penny stock company [deal ‘gone south’]. Whereas, they continued to seek “malicious prosecution” against him, several months after obtaining the ‘Jaclin bank statements’, Delaware corporate records, Federal charges surfaced against New Jersey securities attorney Gregg Jaclin (in California), and the SEC adjudicated a sanction order against the real CEO of RVPlus, Inc.

3. Evidence filed with the Federal courts infer that Garvey was paid by Sanders with political donor funds. Thus, Sanders’ attorney Brad Deutsch made comment to Center for Public Integrity in March 2016, a day after Peterson’s airport arrest. The media public referred to Deutsch of Garvey Shubert Barer as general counsel for the Bernie Sanders 2016 presidential campaign committee, which would elude that “Garvey” (who provided a nonchalant remark to CPI, that ‘he was “not at all surprised” of Peterson arrest’) was paid from donor contribution funds from Bernie Sanders 2016, Inc.


The crux of the ‘Peterson-Sanders Ordeal’ legal action involves the leaking of “Blue Sheet” data (see Blue Sheets Bank Leak Crisis) involving two Assistant U.S. Attorneys in New Jersey who illegally used personal and confidential banking data from FINRA in efforts to enhance prosecution against Peterson, leading to the court’s decision of over four years of Federal imprisonment, opposed to a lower criminal offense level that would have imposed no imprisonment, and could be appealed for full exoneration of criminal charges in the court of appeals while on supervised release. The evidence submitted by Peterson, now docketed as [restricted] court records, sharply illustrate how the U.S. Attorney’s Office in New Jersey received thousands of bank records from FINRA which enclosed complete tax identification numbers, bank account numbers, stock trading activity, and full account holder names and contact addresses of over 150 individuals and businesses who were customers of dozens of American banks and securities brokerage firms.

The disturbing part about the Blue Sheet [data] bank leak crisis is that it happened among the New Jersey Department of Corrections and the U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, where lobbyist Peterson was detained while awaiting sentencing last year. According to court records, Peterson had received the unredacted Blue Sheet “data” from his attorney (as post-conviction evidence that the government did not present to the court until November; six months after the jury trial) while detained in a New Jersey prison- the highly confidential, unsecured “data” was originally sent to Peterson’s attorney by Assistant U.S. Attorney Ari Fontecchio via email on November 1, 2018.

Peterson’s claims to the court are that there were no personal privacy waivers or court orders for subpoenas granted by the U.S. District Court of New Jersey, or any court to permit legal access, possession, and transmission of the unredacted personal bank records from several financial institutions and their banking customers for use in a criminal action- making FINRA’s production of the Blue Sheet data a criminal offense according to U.S. federal laws “18 U.S.C. 1028”, “18 U.S.C. 3”, and a violation to U.S. federal criminal procedures under “Rule 49.1″, ‘Rule 26.2”, and “Rule 12.4”.

More importantly, the antics displayed by Bernie Sanders and his governmental goons raise a substantial question of fact in regards of public interest; in Layman’s terms: The unsecured “Blue Sheet” bank customer data leaked into the U.S. prison system is a jackpot for criminals who have the likelihood to create a national security threat to economy- a wide spread crisis of identify theft and bank fraud among hundreds of businesses and individuals whose vital records were illegally allocated among the hands of persons in the U.S. government and courts, FINRA; and worse- the American prison system.

Peterson first raised the Blue Sheet data issue while pleading for a motion for an injunction at his sentencing hearing last December. Upon judicial permission granted, Peterson handed a copy of the unredacted Blue Sheet data to U.S. District Court Senior Judge Anne E. Thompson (85) for review. The judge was in such ‘wow’ of the document given to her by Peterson, that she interrupted his ‘pro se’ oral pleading for the injunction motion (regarding the same unredacted Blue Sheet data), leading to a lengthy judicial-chamber meeting between the Judge Thompson, two AUSAs, and Peterson’s attorney- which subsequently resulted with an abrupt order from Thompson prohibiting Peterson from ‘pro se’ pleading (under oath) of his [still pending] “Motion for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief” (after handing the unredacted “data” back to Peterson). Thereafter, Thompson sentenced Peterson to fifty-four months of imprisonment, despite her concurring with Peterson’s attorney Eric Marcy, that ‘no evidence of Peterson obtaining net proceeds from securities fraud existed’ (“but potentially could have”).

Overall, Peterson’s litigation against “Garvey” and Friends [indirectly against Bernie Sanders] in the U.S. courts aim at context on public policy and interest; including abuse of judicial resources and political contribution campaigns to finance an [almost] clandestine hate-crime against a ‘congressional lobbyist’ who was merely exercising his Freedom of Speech rights under the Constitution; legitimate formation of political action committees (PACs) registered with the Federal Election Commission that just so happens to accept celebrity donations from everyone from Grammy Award winning artists to an British-American actor who played the character “James Bond”, which was what ignited the media controversy flame on Peterson in 2015- compiled with manufactured charges on Peterson, who formerly had ‘bet on Bernie’ in the past as an “Indie” Party supporter- giving new meaning to ‘feel the burn’.

“NOTICE FROM PUBLISHER: The news content above contains information from the following media sources below. This website shall do its best to make any necessary corrections or updates in accordance with regional, national, and international laws that govern public disclosure made by the media to protect public interest and privacy rights.”

Additional Reference & Media Source(s):
[1]   Cary Lee Peterson v. Garvey Shubert Barer, Case No. 18-CV-14649-BRM (3rd Cir. U.S., N.J. 2018);
[2]  United States v. Cary Lee Peterson, Case No. 3:16-CR-00230-AET (3rd Cir. U.S., N.J. 2016);
[3]  United States v. Peterson, Appeals Docket No. 19-1093 (3rd Cir.);
[4]  Cary Lee Peterson v. Federal Public Defender Office of New Jersey, et al., Case No. 3:2019-CV-00436 (9th Cir. U.S., Oregon, March 25, 2019)

Media Contact
Christopher L. and Sherry H.
Freelance Writer and Editor
Press @


Updated from March 17, 2019  Story still developing…

Previous Related Article Links:

December 5, 2018

December 21, 2018

January 4, 2019